The Battle of Algiers (1966) - Critical Reviews

Synopsis

A film commissioned by the Algerian government that shows the Algerian revolution from both sides. The French foreign legion has left Vietnam in defeat and has something to prove. The Algerians are seeking independence. The two clash. The torture used by the French is contrasted with the Algerian's use of bombs in soda shops. A look at war as a nasty thing that harms and sullies everyone who participates in it.

Critical Acclaim

Upon its release in 1966, The Battle of Algiers was met with widespread critical acclaim for its raw and unflinching portrayal of the Algerian War of Independence. Directed by Gillo Pontecorvo and commissioned by the Algerian government, the film was praised for its documentary-style realism and even-handed depiction of both the Algerian and French perspectives. Critics lauded its ability to convey the complexity of the conflict, using non-professional actors and gritty black-and-white cinematography to enhance its authenticity. It won the Golden Lion at the Venice Film Festival, signaling its immediate impact on the international stage.

In contemporary reviews, Pauline Kael of The New Yorker described the film as "a great film that is also a political act," highlighting its potent blend of art and activism. Film critic Roger Ebert later included it in his Great Movies list, noting its "value as a historical document." Today, The Battle of Algiers holds a 99% approval rating on Rotten Tomatoes, with modern critics continuing to praise its unflinching depiction of both sides of a brutal conflict and its chilling relevance to contemporary discussions on terrorism and colonialism.

The film's legacy endures, influencing filmmakers and political thinkers alike. It has been studied in military academies around the world for its insightful portrayal of urban guerrilla warfare. The Battle of Algiers has appeared on numerous "greatest films of all time" lists, including those by the British Film Institute and Sight & Sound. Its innovative style and powerful narrative ensure its place not only as a cinematic masterpiece but also as a crucial historical artifact that continues to resonate with audiences and scholars decades after its release.